
Life in Kosovo discusses about emergency situations
Tonight, Life in Kosovo will broadcast a debate on the emergency situations in our country.
Read more
Every Thursday starting from 20:30, Radio Television Kosovo, RTK, broadcasts the TV debate show "Life in Kosovo", a joint production of BIRN and RTK.
Read more
26 February 2009 This Thursday’s “Life in Kosovo” show discussed international justice in regards to Kosovo, war crimes and their prosecution in Kosovo.
The debate took place after the UN war crimes tribunal at The Hague, ICTY, acquitted Milan Milutinovic, a former president of Serbia, and ordered his release from custody.
What have we done to in terms of reporting war crimes, and to others who committed crimes in Kosovo, now Kosovo functions as a state? Does the EU mission, EULEX, have anything to say on war crimes in Kosovo? What have they inherited from UNMIK regarding war crimes? Are the charges for war crimes being used for to keep Kosovar politicians in line? Why doesn’t UNMIK have anything to say? Is Kosovo intending to sue Serbia for genocide and reparation?
To discuss these issues and analyse the judicial procedure against the ex-president of Serbia for war crimes in Kosovo, Betim Musliu’s guests were:
Rame Manaj – Deputy Prime Minister ;
Nekibe Kelmendi – Minister of Justice ;
Tome Gashi – lawyer. ;
Behxhet Shala – head of the Council for the Defence of Human Rights and Freedoms. ;
The panel noted that this was the first time the Hague tribunal had issued a verdict on the war crimes committed in Kosovo in 1999.
The debate started with a question directed to Nekibe Kelmendi, the Minister of Justice, and a person who lost members of her family to the Serbian regime.
Citing the former ICTY chief prosecutor Carla del Ponte, Kelmendi noted that the crimes committed in Kosovo were in opposition to the Human Rights Covenant
approved by the UN General Assembly back in 1948.
She also added that while the tribunal set minimum sentences of 20 years and maximum ones of life for such crimes, “Today we saw that the five accused were sentenced to a total of 96 years for 15,000 deaths”.
Rame Manaj, the Deputy Prime Minister, said that the verdict was more like an acquittal than a sentence of guilt.
“We all know that there can’t be equality between crime and sentence… but after all the crimes committed, the rapes, massacres and kidnappings in Kosovo, the leadership that led these acts received a verdict of acquittal rather than a sentence.”
Adding to Manaj’s words, Kelmendi said a verdict sentencing only five people for all the crimes committed in Kosovo was utterly unsatisfactory.
Tom Gashi, lawyer at the Hague tribunal, expressed sympathy for Nekibe Kelmendi and Rame Manaj, as panelists whose families had been devastated by the war.
Asked why Milutinovic was acquitted, Gashi said one of the main reasons was the Hague tribunal’s desire to establish a form of equilibrium, as many Kosovar commandants who had been accused of crimes had been later released.
Gashi added: “We have to wait for the formal reasons to be given by the tribunal, although it has never hidden the fact that it is a political court.”
He said Milutinovic should have been sentenced to jail because he had exercised command responsibility over the forces that carried out the crimes in Kosovo.
“I was not surprised with the verdict,” Behxhet Shala, from the Council for the Defence of Human Rights and Freedoms, said. “I agree with what Tome Gashi said. The Hague tribunal is a political court, which decided everything on a political basis.
“As for its responsibilities towards the Hague tribunal, Kosovo did not fulfill its responsibilities for the witnesses it sent. There was a tendency for witnesses to cause confusion and not to be convincing about what actually happened in Kosovo,” Shala added.
Later, BIRN broadcast an interview with Bernard Rabatel, deputy head of justice in EULEX, who told Krenar Gashi what they had been doing since they became operational.
Asked why local prosecutors could not deal with all cases, Rabatel said some were under EULEX’s jurisdiction, though the local courts did have competences on some serious cases.
Rabatel also told Gashi that war crimes were EULEX’s priority and that among 250 cases that EULEX received from UNMIK, around 50 had to do with war crimes.
BIRN broadcast another interview with Russell Geekie, UNMIK spokesperson, who told Gashi that the justice department in UNMIK was closing down.
Asked about the accountability and responsibility that the departing staff of the UN mission were ready to accept, Geekie said their reputation spoke for itself.
“I believe these people have done an excellent job in justice, which can easily be seen by the fact that most are now independently employed by EULEX,” he added.
Back in the studio, Rame Manaj said UNMIK had promised a lot but had failed to complete or even initiate matters on some issues.
“The greatest negligence concerning what UNMIK has done lies in the judicial sphere,” Gashi said. “I personally believe that all the prosecutors and judgeswho worked in the UNMIK era should be dismissed.
”The debate ended with Musliu’s remarks on EULEX being the only body competent to deal with war crimes in Kosovo, and noting that while Serbia had already sued Kosovo for war crimes, it was unclear whether Kosovars would be compensated for what they suffered.
After the segment on Kosovo’s Son-in-Law’s discovery of the new America, BIRN broadcast a municipal debate between host Jeta Xharra and the mayor of the municipality of Lipjan.
Life in Kosovo is a co-production between Kosovo Public Television,
RTK and the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN. It is
broadcast every Thursday, starting at 20:20.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS
The report on the process of judicial appointments and reappointments analysis the flow of this process, specifically focusing on the bright and dark sides that have marred the process to its final stages.
COURT MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2010 - FEBRUARY 2011
Court monitoring report is published as a result of a continuous monitoring of all municipal and districts courts of Kosovo. The findings of this report are based on the monitoring of 2,147 court hearings, by BIRN monitors.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
This report presents the results of part of BIRN's court monitoring project, specifically on the process for the appointment and reappointment of judges and prosecutors.
Follow the Paper Trail
\"Follow the Paper Trail\", a guide to document-based journalism in Kosovo, explains relevant laws, access to public documents, how to publish safely, where to find databases on investigative journalism, and how to locate documents online through various search engines.
Courts Monitoring Report 2010
A detailed analytical report about the work and administration of the courts in Prishtina, Peja, Prizren, Gjilan, Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Decan, Vushtrri, Poduleva, Lipjan, Klina and Istog. The report contains important information, collected by the network of monitors, placed in the major municipalities of Kosovo and aims to identify the key problems and issues that the justice system in Kosovo is facing.
REPORT: Monitoring the Courts 2009
Monitoring the work and administration of courts in Prishtina, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Vushtrri and Skenderaj.
DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR SYSTEM IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE
The report on Directly Elected mayor System in Local Governance aims to provide a critical overview of the rationale and feasibility of the implementation of a municipal governance system that places the mayor as the central executive figure, during the third year of its application. The efficiency of this system was assessed based on the following pillars: the relationship between local government bodies, accountability of the municipal executive, respect for the law, the link between the mayor and the citizens, provision of public services (water supply and waste management, capital investments (in school and road projects)), level of transparency, public consultation and citizen participation in decision-making.
BIRN Report on Monitoring the Education System
Report on monitoring the elementary and high schools in Prishtina: Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Peja and Gjilan
Analytical report of the situation and the problems in the University of Prishtina
Report on Kosovo`s Healthcare System
Monitoring report on all primary, secondary and tertiary (University Clinical Center of Kosovo, UCCK) healthcare institutions in Pristina, Prizren, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Klina, Decan, Istog and Vushtrri.
Situation and the Problems at the University of Prishtina
Analytical report of research into the standards and problems at the University of Prishtina. Ten years since the end of the war in Kosovo, the University of Prishtina (UP) continues to suffer from a variety of problems, resulting in persistently low quality courses being offered. For this reason, BIRN conducted research into the problems faced by UP students. The data gathered suggests that, out of the many issues reported, the most significant are: the non-implementation of contemporary teaching and assessment methods, the lack of practical work for students, the lack of appropriate academic literature, arbitrary assessments by
professors and generally poor relationships between students and their professors.
Download Here
Buy DVD
Click here to buy a copy of 'Does Anyone Have a Plan?,' BIRN's feature-length documentary on Kosovo's final status.
"Life in Kosovo" debates also available on DVDs now!
Read more
Post Your Comments
Write your comment on BIRN debates and other activities.With the new web-site BIRN looks forward to receive direct opinions from our readers via comment section.
Read more
Comments:
No comments have been posted.