Justice in Kosovo discusses the privatisation of NBI Suhareka winery
Justice in Kosovo broadcast a programme about the privatisation process of the NBI Suhareka wine enterprise, including high-profile suspicions about secret deals between businessmen.
Read more
Every Thursday starting from 20:30, Radio Television Kosovo, RTK, broadcasts the TV debate show "Life in Kosovo", a joint production of BIRN and RTK.
Read more
A Judiciary in Limbo
01 February 2010 In most democratic states in the world, there is a clear division between executive, legislative and judicial powers.
The independent functioning of these powers represents a solid basis for a democratic state, rule of law and a state that promotes and protects human rights, freedom of expression, property rights and more.
There is such a division in Kosovo too, but only on paper.
The interference of politics in Kosovo’s judicial system, absence of laws to reform and restructure the courts, lack of a committee to deal with the jurisprudence examinations and the existence of multiple laws for the same purpose have already caused damage.
And don’t you find it absurd that the reforms to the judiciary have included vetting candidates, but that there is no new blood being vetted, just the same old judges and prosecutors?
With an average age of around 50 years, many of these servants of justice participated in Serbian-run courts during the jackboot years of 1989 to 1999, so it comes as no surprise that citizens are distrustful of the judiciary.
Who is guilty for these problems? If the citizens are asked they would probably respond:
“The Government itself!” I agree with them. Here’s the reason: The draft laws for the reform of the judicial system are gathering dust at the government building of the long-awaited Republic of Kosovo.
Let me give you some examples of the legislation that is in limbo: the draft law on courts, draft law on the organisation of the judicial council, draft law on public prosecutions, draft law on the organisation of the prosecution councils and more.
These are some of the laws which are supposed to bring in a new, proper and better functioning judiciary in Kosovo.
The reasons for not being processed and adopted in parliament are manifold, but the real reasons in my opinion is as follows: apparently there was no coordination within the
Government on the content of the legislation as these bills have remained in the office of
Prime Minister since last March, and secondly I believe that interventions by the international community and theprocess of institutional organisation – such as decentralization – have also had a direct impact on the timetables.
At the end of the day, whatever the reasons, for us, as Kosovo citizens, they don’t really matter.
What matters is the fact that ten years after the war the citizens have their mouths full of rule-of-law words, but in practice no one is pushing ahead with the adoption of these basic laws that would improve substantially the “rule of law”.
For sure, such a situation is suiting someone, but certainly it is not suiting the citizens who have been waiting for a decade now to solve their issues in the courts, leading some plaintiffs to take the justice into their own hands.
The tendency to control the judicial system is evident also with the lack of a parliamentary committee to deal with the jurisprudence examinations.
Two years have past now with no new lawyer in Kosovo’s judicial system.
This, again, is the Government’s fault; respectively the Ministry of Justice, which is legally obliged to make proposals for new lawyers to take the bar exam, and the parliamentary committee for judiciary and legislation, which should discuss the legality of the proposal for a commission on jurisprudence examination.
In a BIRN Report, Bahri Hyseni, head of the parliamentary committee for judiciary and legislation, said that most of the candidates suggested for the parliamentary committee by the ministry do not fulfil the legal requirements.
On the other side, Astrit Kolaj, the spokesperson for the MoJ, blames the delays in forming the jurisprudence committee on the committee for legislation and judiciary, which he says is impeding the process.
If we take into account the proposed names of the candidates for this commission, it’s very obvious why the commission is not formed yet. The zeal and ego of the coalition parties to control everything by any means, regardless of the price for the citizen, have been the main reason for blocking the process.
Justice minister Kelmendi proposed Iliriana Islami, Vjosa Osmani and Ruzhdi Berisha as candidates.
The first two cannot be part of the commission as Islami herself is a judge with the Constitutional Court and Osmani is the advisor to President Sejdiu. Berisha on the other hand, according to Bahri Hyseni, does not fulfil the criteria as he lacks ten consistent years of experience working as a judge.
That the names are people close to LDK is crystal clear, including Ruzhdi Berisha, who publicly declared on the programme ‘Jeta në Kosovë’ that he was a member of the LDK in the past.
The other axis in the coalition - PDK - has its own candidates such as Nerxhivane Dauti and Arsim Bajrami.
The inclusion of these people would clearly be very beneficial for the political parties as it would enable them to decide who will be part of the judicial system in the future.
This push ‘to have my people’ in the judicial system is another indicator that our political parties are hoping to have the Law on their side.
But why would you want to ensure that you have justice on your side if you are clean?
With all my naiveté, I understand that the parties in power are for a judicial system in limbo and not an independent one.
But I am not so naïve as to think that only the Government is to blame here. Part of the blame is also with the new voiceless lawyers.
I can state this based on my experience of when I wanted to interview young lawyers for BIRN’s justice report, but many turned down requests for their views to be heard.
Most of the answers I got went like this: “I can’t be open to speak as they may take revenge when I get to the jurisprudence examination.”
I cannot but ask myself, perhaps my colleagues, the lawyers, who fail to raise their voices against this problem, and all of us, as Kosovo citizens, deserve to be fooled by the Government?
I cannot but ask myself, are we really the “Young Europeans”, the people from the advertising spot which cost the Government millions of Euros?We are giving an image to the world, an image of good-looking and enthusiastic young people, ready “to build a state”, and on the other hand we feel suppressed and disciplined in front of the authorities who could spoil our careers “in case we dare to speak”.
The advertising spot and the rhetoric of the rulers that “no one is above the law” are motivating but it is also immoral to waste money to improve the image to the world when the apple is rotten from inside.
The youth is still considered the future of Kosovo. If we briefly analyse the situation one may learn that we can only become judges and prosecutors when we get to our 30s to 50s.
If we remain silent, tacitly approving an established governance with the tendency to control everything, then we cannot expect to have an independent judiciary.
Isa Gacaferi is a researcher and journalist covering the justice system at BIRN Kosovo. He is currently pursuing his masters at the Faculty of Justice at the University of Pristina.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS
The report on the process of judicial appointments and reappointments analysis the flow of this process, specifically focusing on the bright and dark sides that have marred the process to its final stages.
COURT MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2010 - FEBRUARY 2011
Court monitoring report is published as a result of a continuous monitoring of all municipal and districts courts of Kosovo. The findings of this report are based on the monitoring of 2,147 court hearings, by BIRN monitors.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
This report presents the results of part of BIRN's court monitoring project, specifically on the process for the appointment and reappointment of judges and prosecutors.
Follow the Paper Trail
\"Follow the Paper Trail\", a guide to document-based journalism in Kosovo, explains relevant laws, access to public documents, how to publish safely, where to find databases on investigative journalism, and how to locate documents online through various search engines.
Courts Monitoring Report 2010
A detailed analytical report about the work and administration of the courts in Prishtina, Peja, Prizren, Gjilan, Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Decan, Vushtrri, Poduleva, Lipjan, Klina and Istog. The report contains important information, collected by the network of monitors, placed in the major municipalities of Kosovo and aims to identify the key problems and issues that the justice system in Kosovo is facing.
REPORT: Monitoring the Courts 2009
Monitoring the work and administration of courts in Prishtina, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Vushtrri and Skenderaj.
DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR SYSTEM IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE
The report on Directly Elected mayor System in Local Governance aims to provide a critical overview of the rationale and feasibility of the implementation of a municipal governance system that places the mayor as the central executive figure, during the third year of its application. The efficiency of this system was assessed based on the following pillars: the relationship between local government bodies, accountability of the municipal executive, respect for the law, the link between the mayor and the citizens, provision of public services (water supply and waste management, capital investments (in school and road projects)), level of transparency, public consultation and citizen participation in decision-making.
BIRN Report on Monitoring the Education System
Report on monitoring the elementary and high schools in Prishtina: Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Peja and Gjilan
Analytical report of the situation and the problems in the University of Prishtina
Report on Kosovo`s Healthcare System
Monitoring report on all primary, secondary and tertiary (University Clinical Center of Kosovo, UCCK) healthcare institutions in Pristina, Prizren, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Klina, Decan, Istog and Vushtrri.
Situation and the Problems at the University of Prishtina
Analytical report of research into the standards and problems at the University of Prishtina. Ten years since the end of the war in Kosovo, the University of Prishtina (UP) continues to suffer from a variety of problems, resulting in persistently low quality courses being offered. For this reason, BIRN conducted research into the problems faced by UP students. The data gathered suggests that, out of the many issues reported, the most significant are: the non-implementation of contemporary teaching and assessment methods, the lack of practical work for students, the lack of appropriate academic literature, arbitrary assessments by
professors and generally poor relationships between students and their professors.
Download Here
Buy DVD
Click here to buy a copy of 'Does Anyone Have a Plan?,' BIRN's feature-length documentary on Kosovo's final status.
"Life in Kosovo" debates also available on DVDs now!
Read more
Post Your Comments
Write your comment on BIRN debates and other activities.With the new web-site BIRN looks forward to receive direct opinions from our readers via comment section.
Read more
Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
The opinions expressed in Balkan Insight are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network.
Comments:
No comments have been posted.