
Justice in Kosovo discusses the privatisation of NBI Suhareka winery
Justice in Kosovo broadcast a programme about the privatisation process of the NBI Suhareka wine enterprise, including high-profile suspicions about secret deals between businessmen.
Read more
Every Thursday starting from 20:30, Radio Television Kosovo, RTK, broadcasts the TV debate show "Life in Kosovo", a joint production of BIRN and RTK.
Read more
02 February 2010 The EU enlargement commissioner discusses the conditions for visa liberalisation for Kosovo and highlights rule of law as a key area where improvement is needed.
Q: Looking at the changes to the European Union visa regime, and to liberalization, where is Kosovo on that process?
A: This process has started with those countries that met the conditions on issuing biometric passports and integrating their border control systems for instance. This first materialized with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro, which met these conditions, and will be followed by other countries later on. In Kosovo we have created a structural approach, which will facilitate eventually visa liberalization once Kosovo meets all the conditions.
Q: Critics say you should have made more demands of Serbia regarding its [policy towards its] neighbours before you allowed it into the visa free regime. How would you respond?
A: Visa-free travel, visa liberalization, is not conditional on the kind of issues that you referred to. Serbia has met all the conditions for visa-free travel. We respect our own rules and we play by the book and therefore Serbia and its citizens have been able to enjoy visa free travel as of December 19, 2009.
Q: While citizens of Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro are free to travel to Europe, Kosovars are not free to travel using Kosovo documents to Europe or within the Western Balkans.
A: That it is related to the question of Kosovo’s status. Twenty-two EU member states have recognised Kosovo’s independence but five have not. In this framework, the Commission has proposed a structural approach, which, nevertheless, can be supported by all EU member states. Now it is up to Kosovo to show that it can meet the conditions.
Q: What must Kosovo do?
A: The conditions include [tackling] organised crime and corruption, the future issue of biometric passports and insuring that border control systems work in reliable manner.
Q: Is there a practical example from other countries in the world that could serve as a model so that Serbia could continue to retain the policy of not recognising Kosovo but allow Kosovars to cross the border?
A: Let’s work on the basis of this decision that the European Union has made to Kosovo. Of course, it is important for the whole region that Serbia is also going towards the European Union.
Q: You have said Kosovo has European perspectives. You repeated this after the publication of the Progress Report for Kosovo 2009. Does this perspective have a timeline? When will Kosovo join the European Union?
A: There is no specific timeline because for us quality is more important then speed and substance is more important than a schedule. Whenever any country joins the European Union it has to meet all the conditions. Therefore, this works starts at home. We want to see Kosovo reinforcing its public administration, continues to reform the judiciary so that a rule of law can genuinely function in Kosovo, and intensify the fight against organised crime and corruption. These are critical issues; because the rule of law underpins every open society, every European Union society, and is therefore the starting point.
Q: Just after the publication of the Progress Report for 2009 for Kosovo, the Deputy Prime Minister, Hajredin Kuçi, argued that corruption and organised crime, the areas about which Kosovo was most criticized in the report, are EULEX’s own responsibility.
A: EULEX has its role to play in the rule of law, but frankly, if any leader says something like that, it is an evasion of responsibility. All political leaders are expected… to fight corruption and organised crime, and to take such decisions that will best enable an effective and efficient fight against corruption and organised crime.
Q: One year on, how do you see cooperation between EULEX with Kosovo’s institutions, the government and other institutions working till now?
A: EULEX was originally invited in by Kosovo government and it is essential that the Kosovo government and EULEX cooperate. There have been improvements but still there is plenty of room for improvement and I trust this will be done in the near future.
Q: In many areas where Kosovo is lagging behind, the European Union has offered financial and technical assistance. How could this support be better utilised?
A: The programmes need to be carefully planned in view of their potential benefit and added value to the economic and social welfare of the people of Kosovo. Of course, it is difficult to talk in details about each programme or project because each one has its own specifics but they should serve economical and social welfare, improve infrastructure and help reinforce the rule of law, which is the foundation of a functional society.
Q: Finally, what would you want to tell the people of Kosovo concerning their European Union perspective?
A: Kosovo has a European perspective, like the rest of the region, so it’s important for the people of Kosovo and the leaders to tackle those issues that are needed to materialise this European perspective – issues like the rule of law, and legislative and democratic reforms, and economic and structural reforms, so that Kosovo can become a more open society and economy. This, of course, will be to the benefit of the people of Kosovo in the first place but will also facilitate Kosovo’s integration into the European Union.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS
The report on the process of judicial appointments and reappointments analysis the flow of this process, specifically focusing on the bright and dark sides that have marred the process to its final stages.
COURT MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2010 - FEBRUARY 2011
Court monitoring report is published as a result of a continuous monitoring of all municipal and districts courts of Kosovo. The findings of this report are based on the monitoring of 2,147 court hearings, by BIRN monitors.
THE PROCESS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
This report presents the results of part of BIRN's court monitoring project, specifically on the process for the appointment and reappointment of judges and prosecutors.
Follow the Paper Trail
\"Follow the Paper Trail\", a guide to document-based journalism in Kosovo, explains relevant laws, access to public documents, how to publish safely, where to find databases on investigative journalism, and how to locate documents online through various search engines.
Courts Monitoring Report 2010
A detailed analytical report about the work and administration of the courts in Prishtina, Peja, Prizren, Gjilan, Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Decan, Vushtrri, Poduleva, Lipjan, Klina and Istog. The report contains important information, collected by the network of monitors, placed in the major municipalities of Kosovo and aims to identify the key problems and issues that the justice system in Kosovo is facing.
REPORT: Monitoring the Courts 2009
Monitoring the work and administration of courts in Prishtina, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Vushtrri and Skenderaj.
DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR SYSTEM IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE
The report on Directly Elected mayor System in Local Governance aims to provide a critical overview of the rationale and feasibility of the implementation of a municipal governance system that places the mayor as the central executive figure, during the third year of its application. The efficiency of this system was assessed based on the following pillars: the relationship between local government bodies, accountability of the municipal executive, respect for the law, the link between the mayor and the citizens, provision of public services (water supply and waste management, capital investments (in school and road projects)), level of transparency, public consultation and citizen participation in decision-making.
BIRN Report on Monitoring the Education System
Report on monitoring the elementary and high schools in Prishtina: Mitrovica, Ferizaj, Peja and Gjilan
Analytical report of the situation and the problems in the University of Prishtina
Report on Kosovo`s Healthcare System
Monitoring report on all primary, secondary and tertiary (University Clinical Center of Kosovo, UCCK) healthcare institutions in Pristina, Prizren, Peja, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Gjakova, Klina, Decan, Istog and Vushtrri.
Situation and the Problems at the University of Prishtina
Analytical report of research into the standards and problems at the University of Prishtina. Ten years since the end of the war in Kosovo, the University of Prishtina (UP) continues to suffer from a variety of problems, resulting in persistently low quality courses being offered. For this reason, BIRN conducted research into the problems faced by UP students. The data gathered suggests that, out of the many issues reported, the most significant are: the non-implementation of contemporary teaching and assessment methods, the lack of practical work for students, the lack of appropriate academic literature, arbitrary assessments by
professors and generally poor relationships between students and their professors.
Download Here
Buy DVD
Click here to buy a copy of 'Does Anyone Have a Plan?,' BIRN's feature-length documentary on Kosovo's final status.
"Life in Kosovo" debates also available on DVDs now!
Read more
Post Your Comments
Write your comment on BIRN debates and other activities.With the new web-site BIRN looks forward to receive direct opinions from our readers via comment section.
Read more
Comments:
No comments have been posted.